Find Your Specialist


Contact Us

    Go Back

    IRS Explains New Limits on Executive Compensation Deduction

    Companies hoping to sidestep the new limits on the executive compensation deduction may be disappointed with new guidance from the IRS, which restricts the grandfather rules and confirms the expanded scope of covered executives. Notice 2018-68 narrowly construes whether pre-2018 contracts qualify for the binding contract exemption. The Notice also clarifies that covered employees are those that served as an executive officer at any time during the tax year.

    New Limits for 2018

    The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) expanded the $1 million deduction limit for compensation paid to officers of large publicly-held corporations by applying it to the five top executives, including the principal executive officer (PEO), the principal financial officer (PFO), and the three other, highest paid employees. It also removed the exemption for commissions and performance-based compensation, such as stock options, cash bonuses, and some deferred compensation, which now are subject to the $1 million deduction cap.

    Covered Employees not Limited to Proxy Disclosures

    Executive officers of publicly-held corporations can be covered employees even when disclosure of their compensation is not required under the SEC rules, the IRS states in the Notice. Thus, an employee need not hold his or her position as of the end of the corporation’s taxable year or need not be listed in the proxy disclosure materials to be considered a “covered employee.” Despite the fact that the IRS received numerous requests to exempt employees who did not hold their positions at the end of the year, the IRS Notice includes as a “covered employee” anyone who meets the definition at any time during the year.


    Facts: Assume Z Corporation has a fiscal year ending December 31 for SEC reporting purposes. Corporation Z is a calendar year taxpayer and a publicly held corporation. For 2018, Employee A served as the sole PEO of Corporation Z and Employees B and C both served as the PFO of Corporation Z at different times during the year. Employees D, E, and F were the first, second, and third most highly compensated executive officers of Corporation Z for 2018 other than the PEO and PFO, and all three retired before the end of 2018. Employees G, H, and I were Corporation Z’s fourth, fifth, and sixth highest compensated executive officers for 2018, and all three were serving at the end of 2018.

    Conclusion:  Because Employee A served as the PEO during 2018, Employee A is a covered employee. Because Employees B and C served as the PFO during 2018, Employees B and C are covered employees. Even though the SEC rules require Corporation Z to also disclose the compensation of Employees D, E, G, H, and I for 2018, Corporation Z’s covered employees for 2018 are Employees D, E, and F, because these are the three highest compensated executive officers other than the PEO and PFO for 2018. Note that Employee F would not have to be disclosed under the SEC rules but is a covered employee under the IRS executive compensation rules.

    Determining Grandfathered Status

    The TCJA rules grandfather in compensation provided under a written binding contract that was in effect on November 2, 2017, if the contract is not modified in any material way on or after that date. Overall, the IRS Notice applies this rule narrowly, making it difficult to avoid the deduction cap under the binding contract rule. One bright spot is that renewals of binding contracts continue to be exempt from the deduction cap. For example, if the terms of a contract provide that it will be automatically renewed or extended as of a certain date unless either the corporation or the employee provides notice of termination of the contract at least 30 days before that date, the contract is treated as renewed as of the date that termination would be effective.

    Grandfathered status will be lost for if there are material amendments to the contract, such as substantially increasing a certain type of compensation, accelerating compensation, or providing a different type of compensation. A supplemental payment that represents a “reasonable cost-of-living increase” however, will not be considered a material change. The IRS offers examples of these types of changes and their effect on the deduction cap.

    The failure to exercise negative discretion under a contract does not result in the material modification of that contract. However, only the amount of incentive compensation that is required to be paid under state law or under the compensation agreement is protected from the deduction cap. An IRS example explains that, if the agreement provides up to $1.5 million in incentive compensation with negative discretion to reduce the award to $400,000, then only the $400,000 will be exempt from the deduction cap.

    Other examples illustrate that if the plan allows the company to amend the plan to freeze or reduce contributions in the future, then only the portion of the benefit that is protected from change and that has accrued as of 11/2/2017 is grandfathered.

    Review Covered Execs Now

    The Notice provides many other clarifications which are important to understand. Companies subject to executive compensation limits should review compensation agreements put in place before November 2, 2017, in light of these clarifications to determine which employees are covered and which contracts are binding. Contact your Frazier & Deeter tax professional to help you with this analysis and to determine how best to handle executive compensation in the future given the new deduction rules.

    Related Articles

    • 01.25.2023

      A New Year Means New Privacy Laws

      Ever since the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) came into effect in May 2018, US state privacy laws have been passed in Virginia, Colorado, Connecticut, Utah and, most pressing of them all, California. The California Privacy Rights Act (CPRA) went…

      Continue Reading
    • 01.19.2023

      The New Rules Under Section 174

      Internal Revenue Code Section 174 has long been used by taxpayers to deduct certain expenses related to research and experimentation (R&E) in the current year.  The code section was originally enacted in 1954 to eliminate uncertainty in the tax accounting…

      Continue Reading
    • 12.20.2022

      IRS Customer Service May Improve in 2023

      With 4,000 new customer service representatives and plans to hire 700 new Taxpayer Assistance Center (TAC) employees, taxpayers soon may get relief from endless hold times, no in-person help and unresolved problems.

      Continue Reading
    • 12.12.2022

      Reduce Taxable Income with IRA Distributions Transfers

      IRA owners who are age 70½ or over can transfer up to $100,000 per year to charity to reduce their taxable income. These transfers, known as qualified charitable distributions or QCDs, offer end-of-the year tax savings and can count toward required minimum distributions (RMDs) that taxpayers who are age 72 must make each year. Think of it as a tax-free charitable rollover of IRA funds.

      Continue Reading
    • 12.02.2022

      UK R&D Tax Reliefs – Where Are We Now?

      In the November 2022 Autumn Statement, the Chancellor announced significant changes to the current Research and Development (R&D) tax reliefs. The key announcements were a change to the applicable rate of the Research and Development Expenditure Credit (RDEC) and a…

      Continue Reading
    • 12.01.2022

      1099s Required for 2022 Tax Year

      Taxpayers earning income from selling goods or providing services may receive a Form 1099-K, Payment Card and Third-Party Network Transactions, for the first time in early 2023, when the 2022 forms are due. The requirement to file Forms 1099 have…

      Continue Reading
    • 11.28.2022

      IRS Uncovers $3.1 Billion in COVID Fraud

      The IRS Criminal Investigation department (IRS-CI) has partnered with the Justice Department to uncover and prosecute fraudulent activities related to the federal government’s COVID relief programs. To date, the IRS has conducted 840 investigations involving fraud amounts totaling more than…

      Continue Reading
    • 10.25.2022

      IRS Inflation Reduction Act Increases Funds

      The Inflation Reduction Act of 2022, enacted in August, increased funding for the IRS by $80 billion through 2031 for enforcement activities, operations support, systems modernization and taxpayer services. The legislative language, Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen and IRS Commissioner Charles…

      Continue Reading

    Privacy Overview

    When you use or access the Site, we use cookies, device identifiers, and similar technologies such as pixels, web beacons, and local storage to collect information about how you use the Site. We process the information collected through such technologies, which may include Personal Information, to help operate certain features of the Site (e.g., to prevent online poll participants from voting more than once), to enhance your experience through personalization, and to help us better understand the features of the Site that you and other users are most interested in.

    You can enable or disable our use of cookies per category.
    Always Enabled