Find Your Specialist


Contact Us

    Go Back

    Conservation Easements Case: Texas Ranch Boundary Modifications Did Not Invalidate

    Bosque Canyon Ranch in Texas is home to the habitat of the gold-cheeked warbler, a listed endangered species. It also is the subject of a far-reaching Circuit Court decision that halted the IRS’s attempt to invalidate a conservation easement put in place to save those warblers. The controversy started when the IRS convinced the Tax Court in 2015 that charitable deductions should be denied to the Ranch’s developers because the conservation easements they conveyed contained provisions allowing the internal boundaries within the easements to be modified. The Tax Court also backed the IRS’s contention that the ranch partnerships had not provided adequate “baseline documentation.”

    Court Okays Internal Boundary Changes

    Bosque Canyon Ranch appealed the Tax Court ruling, and now the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals has vacated that judgment and remanded the case for further consideration. (B.C. Ranch II, L.P. v. Commissioner) The Appeals Court disagreed with the IRS’s assertion that possible boundary modifications meant the easement was not given in perpetuity. The Court pointed to the fact that only internal boundaries could be modified, not external boundaries. Also, the easements could be amended only with the holder of the easement, North American Land Trust’s, consent and then only to modify the boundaries of the reserved 5-acre homesite parcels, not to increase their areas above five acres. The amount of land set aside for conservation would not change.

    The Court noted that the boundary modification provisions reflected a “common sense” approach to addressing unforeseen circumstances, such as the need to avoid the nesting sites for the warblers. This flexibility “clearly benefits all parties, and ultimately the flora and fauna that are their true beneficiaries,” the Court concluded.

    Baseline Documentation

    The taxpayers also convinced the Appeals Court that they had provided adequate documentation regarding the boundary modification rights. IRS regulations require that donors of conservation easements must give the donee sufficient documentation about any special conditions attached to an easement at the time of the gift. This is known as “baseline documentation” and includes: (1) survey maps showing the property line and other protected areas, (2) a map of the area showing man-made improvements, vegetation, flora and fauna (including rare species locations), (3) land use history, and distinct natural features, (4) an aerial photograph of the property taken as close as possible to the date of the donation, and (5) on-site photographs taken at appropriate locations on the property.

    In the Bosque Canyon case, the documentation given to the Land Trust included: aerial photographs and detailed maps; a recorded copy of the deed; existing conditions report; a habitat assessment; a site plan showing homesite parcels; and a signed owner acknowledgement that the documents were an accurate representation of the condition of the land. The site survey described the golden-cheeked warbler habitat and a conservation biologist’s notes.

    The 5th Circuit found that this was “more than sufficient” to meet the documentation requirements, saying the Tax Court had failed to consider significant information presented by the taxpayers. The 5th Circuit admonished that the Tax Court’s “…hyper-technical requirements for baseline documentation, if allowed to stand, would create uncertainty by imposing ambiguous and subjective standards for such documentation and are contrary to the very purpose of the statute. If left in place, that holding would undoubtedly discourage and hinder future conservation easements.”

    Reasons for Remand

    Although the 5th Circuit sided with the taxpayer on many issues, it sent the case back down to the lower court to consider other grounds on which the IRS wanted to invalidate the easements. The IRS seeks to characterize the limited partners’ capital contributions to the ranchland partnerships as disguised sales, and the value of appurtenant rights are in question.

    Despite the remand, the take-away from this case is that limited boundary modification rights retained in the granting of a conservation easement will not invalidate the charitable deduction. However, it is key that boundary modifications only affect the internal boundaries of the land and that any changes do not affect the amount of land set aside in the easement.

    Related Articles

    Privacy Overview

    When you use or access the Site, we use cookies, device identifiers, and similar technologies such as pixels, web beacons, and local storage to collect information about how you use the Site. We process the information collected through such technologies, which may include Personal Information, to help operate certain features of the Site (e.g., to prevent online poll participants from voting more than once), to enhance your experience through personalization, and to help us better understand the features of the Site that you and other users are most interested in.

    You can enable or disable our use of cookies per category.
    Always Enabled

    Essential cookies enable you to navigate our Site and use certain features, such as accessing secure areas of our Site and using other features of our service that require us to keep track of certain information as you navigate from page to page. Although some of these cookies are “required” to enable certain functionality, you can disable them in the browser, but doing so will limit your ability to use the features supported by such cookies.

    Functionality cookies are cookies that support features of the Site, such as remembering your preferences.

    These cookies collect information about how you use our Site, including which pages you go to most often and if they receive error messages from certain pages. These cookies are only used to improve how our Site functions and performs.

    From time-to-time, we may engage third parties that track individuals who visit our Site. These third parties may track your use of the Site for purposes of providing us with certain marketing automation features (to help us improve our outreach to current and prospective clients) and providing you with targeted advertisements.