Recent Tax Court Case Clarifies R&D Credit Eligibility in Agriculture

Filed under

Natural Resources & Agribusiness

A recent U.S. Tax Court case provided important clarity regarding what constitutes “qualified research” in the agricultural industry, and reinforced that adequate substantiation and documentation is absolutely essential for a credit claim to stand.

George v. Commissioner and Its Impact on Agricultural R&D Tax Credits

In George v. Commissioner, the Tax Court examined whether large-scale poultry production activities relating to seven research trials qualified for the Research and Development (R&D) credit. The court did allow credits for activities where the taxpayer was able to demonstrate technical uncertainty at the outset and provide documentation of activities that were designed as experiments that the taxpayer was trying to learn from.

Notably, this case confirms that non-traditional inputs, such as animals, feed, seed, fertilizer, or similar items, can potentially be considered as qualified “supplies” for the R&D tax credit. The key is that they are part of a process of experimentation that can be tied directly to a business component, which, for example, can be a new feed formulation, genetic research or crop protection regimes.

What the Court Found in George v. Commissioner

After analysis of each trial, the court allowed certain production costs that functioned as pilot models for QREs. These activities were deemed eligible because they were designed to resolve technical uncertainty, rather than being purely for the sale of a product, and the activities were supported by adequate substantiation, credible testimony, and contemporaneous documentation.

However, the court also disallowed credits for research trials that lacked quality documentation and, therefore, were unable to demonstrate the existence of technical uncertainty at the outset of the trials. In cases where documentation was poor and the projects were based on assumptions or later analysis, the court argued those specific trials were 1) not designed to discover new knowledge or 2) that earlier activities already resolved the relevant uncertainty; therefore, those expenses were deemed ordinary production costs and not considered research.

Key Takeaway: Substantiation Remains Critical

A key takeaway from the case is the importance of contemporaneous documentation.

Credits were only allowed where experimental flocks could be identified and supported by contemporaneous records such as feed logs, trial designs, and flock identifiers that tied costs directly to specific research activities.

The court disallowed costs related to projects where documentation did not distinguish experimental from nonexperimental production.

While this case is a strong indicator that agricultural business can qualify for the R&D tax credit, it is also a further warning, alongside previous court cases like Little Sandy Coal v. Commissioner and Betz v. Commissioner, that clear substantiation and documentation are critical any business looking to make an R&D credit claim.

Where R&D Opportunities May Exist in Agriculture

For those in the agricultural industry, below are some examples of opportunity areas within the industry where associated costs can potentially be considered for the R&D credit, assuming the proper records and contemporaneous documentation can be provided:

Technologies and/or processes to improve the harvest lifecycle, from planting to harvest
Automation/robotics to increase yield or improve production efficiency
Developing technology to evaluate and test soil intended to improve growing capabilities
Breeding and/or feeding techniques for livestock, including cloning technologies
Product development through crossbreeding, biotech research or cloning
Reducing the reliance on chemicals
Developing solutions to resolve issues of food insecurity
Waste reduction or reuse, including technological advancements in composting
Packaging processes for better managing moisture or temperature
Methods or technologies to minimize/eliminate crop damage from disease
Technologies to improve ultimate yield/freshness of products from harvest through transport
Accelerating weight gain and/or fat marbling in livestock
Irrigation systems, or soil improvement, plant nutrients or fertilizers

If you’re operating in the agricultural sector and developing new processes, products, or technologies, understanding how your activities are documented can be just as important as the work itself. Our team can help assess whether your activities may qualify for the R&D tax credit and how to properly substantiate them.

Talk to a specialist