Find Your Specialist


Contact Us

    Go Back

    Mobile Workforce Bill Attempts to Simplify State Tax Filing Requirements

    Today’s business travelers deal with “A patchwork of complicated nonresident income tax laws.” This assessment comes from the Mobile Workforce Coalition, an advocacy group seeking simplification of state laws taxing nonresidents who work outside of their home state. Currently, states have inconsistent standards for how employers and employees must report income earned from working out of state.

    Employees are required to file personal income tax returns for the states they travel to for temporary work periods. Also, employers must withhold income tax on employees who work outside of their home state for temporary work periods. Many states require filing even if the employee is there on business for only one day of the year. With 43 states and the District of Columbia levying a personal income tax on wages and partnership income, business travelers face a significant burden every time they work away from home.

    Take Georgia, for example. Its rules for withholding on nonresident employees are based on a three-part test looking at: 1) whether an employee has worked there for twenty-three days in a calendar quarter; 2) whether more than five percent of the employee’s income is attributable to work in Georgia; or 3) whether the employee has received payment for services in Georgia that exceeds $5,000.

    Feds Step In

    Employers have been trying for years to get Congress to create a uniform rule that would apply to business travelers across the nation. Although bills have been introduced in the past, none have made it through the legislative process. This year the bill has unusual momentum, with the House passing the Mobile Workforce Act, H.R. 1393, on June 20th, much earlier than in past years. Also, the bill has been changed from previous versions to address some of the states’ biggest concerns. The bill now heads to the Senate, which has its own companion bill, S. 540. The bills have bipartisan support, with the House bill having 20 Democrats and 37 Republicans as co-sponsors and the Senate bill having 21 Democrats, 26 Republicans, and one Independent as cosponsors.

    30-Day Threshold

    Under H.R. 1393, employees would not be subject to another state’s income taxes unless they worked more than 30 days in a calendar year in that state. This threshold is not continuous, so an employee that makes a number of short business trips to a state might still cross it. Once 30 days is exceeded, the withholding obligation is retroactive to the first day worked in the state.

    If an employee works in a nonresident state for any part of a day, then it is a “nonresident day.” If an employee works in two or more nonresident states during the same day, then it is a “nonresident day” in the nonresident state in which the employee has worked longer for that day. Time spent in transit through a state is disregarded in determining a “day.”

    The bill exempts “prominent” professional athletes, entertainers, and public figures who are paid on a per appearance basis. They remain subject to each state’s laws. Film, television, and other video production employees also are excluded from the Act’s protections. The House Report on the bill notes that, like professional entertainers and athletes, these employees earn income from their work in specific states, many of which offer tax credits for local productions. They are excluded if the associated tax credits are contingent on withholding wages earned in the state.

    Effective Date, Outlook

    The effective date is set in the future to give states time to develop administrative guidance and to minimize fiscal impacts on the states. The bill would take effect on January 1 of the second calendar year that begins after enactment and would not apply to any tax obligation that accrues before the effective date.

    Despite the bipartisan support, the bill could be derailed by the current backup in Congress on major legislation. However, its chances are bolstered by a recent Congressional Budget Office (CBO) report estimating that the bill would result in a minimal total state revenue shortfall of between $55 and $100 million in 2020 and would have no direct impact on the federal budget. Business travelers take heart. It just may happen this time.

    About the Blogger

    Lucia Nasuti Smeal is a guest blogger on tax topics for Frazier & Deeter. Smeal is an attorney, a tax Professor with Georgia State University’s J. Mack Robinson College of Business, and former editor of Tax Notes Today, published by Tax Analysts. Smeal also worked as a legislative analyst for the Congressional Research Service and is a former member of the U.S. House Periodical Press Corps. She is a frequent speaker on current tax developments.

    Related Articles

    Privacy Overview

    When you use or access the Site, we use cookies, device identifiers, and similar technologies such as pixels, web beacons, and local storage to collect information about how you use the Site. We process the information collected through such technologies, which may include Personal Information, to help operate certain features of the Site (e.g., to prevent online poll participants from voting more than once), to enhance your experience through personalization, and to help us better understand the features of the Site that you and other users are most interested in.

    You can enable or disable our use of cookies per category.
    Always Enabled

    Essential cookies enable you to navigate our Site and use certain features, such as accessing secure areas of our Site and using other features of our service that require us to keep track of certain information as you navigate from page to page. Although some of these cookies are “required” to enable certain functionality, you can disable them in the browser, but doing so will limit your ability to use the features supported by such cookies.

    Functionality cookies are cookies that support features of the Site, such as remembering your preferences.

    These cookies collect information about how you use our Site, including which pages you go to most often and if they receive error messages from certain pages. These cookies are only used to improve how our Site functions and performs.

    From time-to-time, we may engage third parties that track individuals who visit our Site. These third parties may track your use of the Site for purposes of providing us with certain marketing automation features (to help us improve our outreach to current and prospective clients) and providing you with targeted advertisements.