Find Your Specialist


Contact Us

Go Back

Accounting Standards Update Issue 12 D

On January 17, 2013 the Financial Accounting Standard Board’s Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) finalized an issue related to accounting for obligations resulting from joint and several liability arrangements.

If the EITF’s consensus is ratified by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) at its January 30, 2013 meeting it will become final authoritative accounting guidance, in accordance with the effective dates contained in the consensus.

Issue 12-D—Accounting for Obligations Resulting from Joint and Several Liability Arrangements for which the Total Amount of the Obligation is Fixed at the Reporting Date

First let’s look at the issue requiring clarification. Under joint and several liability arrangements, the total amount of an obligation is wholly enforceable against any of the parties to the arrangement. For example, if four entities enter into a joint and several liability arrangement for $20 million, it is at least possible that one entity could be required to repay the entire $20 million. This would be the case even if the four entities created an internal allocation arrangement for repayment of the liability.

Diversity currently exists in the recognition and measurement of these obligations. Some entities record the entire amount of the obligation, while others only record the amount that they expect to pay. In cases where an entity only records the amount it expects to pay, this may or may not include a portion of amounts it considers owed by others due to a variety of factors, usually assessed under the ASC 450 contingencies model.

EITF reacts to feedback to June 2012 consensus

In June 2012, the EITF reached a consensus-for-exposure that joint and several obligations should generally be measured under existing contingencies guidance found in ASC 450. However, the EITF also determined that financial guarantee guidance should apply if the entity’s role is primarily that of a guarantor.

After evaluating feedback through comment letters, in January, the EITF amended its previous consensus to remove all references to guarantee guidance due to the impractical nature of applying such guidance. Accordingly, for joint and several obligations, an entity should recognize the respective portion of the obligation it agrees to pay among its co-obligors and assess any additional amounts it expects to pay related to amounts borrowed by its co-obligors applying the measurement principles of the contingencies model under ASC 450.

Enhanced disclosures similar to those required for financial guarantees will be required for obligations with joint and several liability. The guidance will be effective for public entities for fiscal years and interim periods in those years beginning after December 15, 2013. The effective date for nonpublic entities is deferred until annual periods ending after December 15, 2014 and to interim and annual periods thereafter. Early adoption is permitted.

For more information about complex accounting and disclosure requirements such as Issue 12-D, or other accounting developments, please email Bill Godshall, Lead Quality Control Partner and leader of our Public Company Audit and Advisory Practice at bill.godshall@frazierdeeter.com

Related Articles

Privacy Overview

When you use or access the Site, we use cookies, device identifiers, and similar technologies such as pixels, web beacons, and local storage to collect information about how you use the Site. We process the information collected through such technologies, which may include Personal Information, to help operate certain features of the Site (e.g., to prevent online poll participants from voting more than once), to enhance your experience through personalization, and to help us better understand the features of the Site that you and other users are most interested in.

You can enable or disable our use of cookies per category.
Always Enabled

Essential cookies enable you to navigate our Site and use certain features, such as accessing secure areas of our Site and using other features of our service that require us to keep track of certain information as you navigate from page to page. Although some of these cookies are “required” to enable certain functionality, you can disable them in the browser, but doing so will limit your ability to use the features supported by such cookies.


Functionality cookies are cookies that support features of the Site, such as remembering your preferences.


These cookies collect information about how you use our Site, including which pages you go to most often and if they receive error messages from certain pages. These cookies are only used to improve how our Site functions and performs.

Tracking or Targeting

From time-to-time, we may engage third parties that track individuals who visit our Site. These third parties may track your use of the Site for purposes of providing us with certain marketing automation features (to help us improve our outreach to current and prospective clients) and providing you with targeted advertisements.