Nonprofit Insights

New Auditing Standards And Your Audit

Report On The National Single Audit Sampling Project

The Boomers Are Coming! Are You Ready?

 

Back to previous page

NONPROFIT INSIGHTS

New Auditing Standards And Your Audit

The drive for improved financial accountability in the public and nonpublic sectors has resulted in an unprecedented level of regulation affecting auditors and their clients. In early 2006, the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) issued a series of new auditing standards, Statements on Auditing Standards Nos. 104-111.

These new standards are designed to improve the audit process by requiring auditors to perform specific risk assessments for each client and then tailor audit procedures to address those risks. They are generally effective for audits of financial statements for periods beginning on or after December 15, 2006.

How Your Audit Will Be Impacted

As you might expect, there will be major changes to how CPAs perform your audit. Changes that you could see as the new standards are implemented include:

• Stronger focus on internal controls. The standards require auditors to obtain a thorough knowledge of five distinct elements of internal control, and evaluate if the controls are appropriately designed and implemented. In certain instances, the auditor may be required to further test the controls.

• Identification of significant risks. For areas of significant risk, auditors will generally be required to perform more work, as analytical and substantive procedures by themselves will no longer be adequate.

• Auditing of disclosures. Auditors will need to spend more time to ensure that disclosures prepared by clients have been adequately presented.

6 Steps You Can Take

Naturally, implementing the procedures called for in these new standards will require additional work and may impact your audit fee. But proactive nonprofits can take steps to ensure an efficient and cost-effective audit. For example, be sure to have clear and concise documentation of your internal control structure in place. Other proactive steps include:

1. Educate your people. Auditors will require information not only from the accounting department but from senior management, board members and even your membership. Establish a timeline for responding to information requests — and make sure all internal and external parties affecting your audit adhere to it.

2. Educate your auditor. Provide your auditor with complete information on how your organization operates, including industry, environmental, regulatory and economic conditions. Identify what your organization does to measure and review financial performance — this should include names and frequency of reports generated, ratios calculated, use of forecasts and budgets, and whether you have used outside benchmarks such as information from trade associations. Likewise, provide the auditor with detailed information and documentation of your internal controls.

3. Identify potential internal control deficiencies. Meet with your auditors to identify deficiencies that may meet the new reporting threshold as "material weaknesses" or "significant deficiencies." For example, a lack of appropriate segregation of duties created by staff vacancies or turnover could qualify as a material weakness.

4. Designate a point person. Designate one person to be responsible on a timely basis for reviewing misstatements discovered during test procedures, discussing control deficiencies and approving the draft financial statements and notes.

5. Communicate. Schedule periodic conference calls between the audit committee chair and the audit firm to discuss audit status and avoid surprises, delays and cost overruns. Likewise, Make sure management is in the loop — little is accomplished by circumventing management and going directly to the audit chair.

6. Budget accordingly. The impact of 8 new auditing standards in one year will be significant and immediate for many organizations. Budget accordingly and manage this increase through good planning and regular monitoring of the annual audit process.

Final Thoughts

The issuance of Statements on Auditing Standards Nos. 104-111 will challenge nonprofits and their auditors to better plan and execute their audits for improved efficiency and effectiveness. Upfront planning and communication between organizations and their auditors is the key to complying with these standards while minimizing associated increases in audit costs and internal control exceptions.

Contact our office today to discuss how you and your auditor can work together to minimize the impact of these recent changes on your organization.

back to top

Report On The National Single Audit Sampling Project

Each year, the federal government spends billions of dollars on federal awards to state and local government entities and non-profit organizations. To ensure that these monies are being used for their intended purpose, the Single Audit Act requires all nonfederal entities that receive and expend $500,000 or more in federal awards in a year to obtain an annual “single audit.” Described in OMB Circular A-133, this type of audit is typically referred to as an A-133 audit.

The State of A-133 Audits

Overall, compliance with federal regulations appears to be high. But one study indicates that smaller nonprofits, those that are new to government grants, and those with prior audit findings have a significantly higher rate of adverse audit findings. The study opines that, perhaps for cost or other reasons, these nonprofits are being audited by less experienced auditors.

Another report, The National Single Audit Sampling Project, utilized Quality Control Reviews (QCRs) to develop a statistically based measure of audit quality and recommend changes to improve the quality of single audits. QCRs were conducted on a statistical sample randomly selected from a universe of over 38,000 audits. The population was split into two categories: Level I included audits of entities that expended $50 million or more of federal awards, while Level II included audits of entities that expended at least $500,000 but less than $50 million of federal awards.

What Was Found

Of the 208 audits reviewed, the statistical sample showed that a sizeable percentage contained some type of deficiency. There was a noticeable difference in quality between the two levels, with a higher percentage of unacceptable audits for Level II.

The most prevalent deficiencies included:

• Not documenting the understanding of internal controls over compliance requirements
• Not documenting testing internal controls of at least some compliance requirements
• Not documenting compliance testing of at least some compliance requirements.

Recommendations

The Audit Committee of the President’s Council on Integrity and Efficiency (PCIE) noted that the number of audits in the acceptable group indicates that, with the application of due professional care, proper single audits can be performed. That said, the
Council did recommend that the federal Office of Management and Budget (OMB) work with related parties, including the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants
(AICPA), to reduce the deficiencies noted and improve the quality of single audits. The recommended three-pronged approach includes:

• Revising and improving single audit standards, criteria and guidance.

• Establishing minimum requirements for training on performing single audits.

• Reviewing and enhancing processes to address unacceptable single audits.

Ensuring Compliance

Organizations should take all necessary measures to ensure that they are complying with single audit criteria. In requesting proposals for audit services, the objectives and scope of the audit should be made clear. Factors to be considered in evaluating each proposal for audit services include:

• The responsiveness to the request for proposal
• Relevant experience
• Availability of staff with professional qualifications and technical abilities
• The results of external quality control reviews
• Price

Questions about an A-133 audit? You can count on our qualified CPAs to provide guidance.

back to top

The Boomers Are Coming! Are You Ready?

The Chronicle of Philanthropy forecasts an "involvement boom" in the coming years as Baby Boomers retire. The good news is that Boomer donors, in particular, offer larger gifts, better retention and more upgrade potential. But they also offer some unique challenges.
They’ll be critical of your performance. Boomers are notoriously intolerant of poor service. In fact, many of the respondents in a recent study said that nonprofit groups need to improve the way they run their volunteer programs.

They’ll demand more connection. Boomers require more information and involvement from the nonprofits they support (they also have the ability to research for themselves about you).

They’re giving for different reasons. The donors of previous generations gave out of duty. Boomer donors give for self-directed reasons. If their gift doesn't "work" (i.e., if they don't see credible evidence that you used their gift to change the world) they'll go elsewhere.

They require a different fundraising approach. As Boomers take over, you’re likely to see some real differences in what's effective in fundraising, including the need for higher levels of relevance, choice, specificity and proof of effectiveness.

What You Can Do:

  • Be ready for a lot of people seeking volunteer opportunities.
  • Make sure you have your act together (not just that you think you have it together).
  • Have plenty of ways for volunteers to interact meaningfully with you.
  • Enable Boomers to donate in ways they find compelling. They'll do it.

back to top